EN language EN        SK language SK

Instructions for Authors

Papers presentation

 Invited lecture: 30 minutes including discussion

 Lecture: 20 minutes including discussion

 Poster: maximum size 1190 x 860 mm

Posters will be presented in electronic form (presentation in PPT or PDF), which will be projected onto the LCD monitors.

  Presentation facilities

  • Data projector

  • MS Windows 7

  • MS Office 2013

  • Adobe Acrobat Reader 9.3

Accepted papers prepared in camera-ready format will be included in Conference Preprints and published on conference proceeding and USB key.

Instructions for uploading papers (*.pdf format) are available after logging in (using your login
name and passcode) in “Add paper”.

Chosen papers will be published in selected journals.

minimum of three pages is required and maximum of six A4-sized pages is allowed. 

Conference proceeding at the USB key will be given to all participants.Printing proceeding from each conference will be given to participants which paid fee for printing proceeding (50 Euro).

 Template Download



The best student papers will be awarded.


Žaneta Eleschová

Július Cirák

Milan Perný

Anton Beláň

Email: anton.belan@stuba.sk

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

Editorial process 

In the processes of conference and proceedings preparation we are committed to editorial independence, and strive in all cases to prevent this principle from being compromised through conflicts of interest, fear, or any other influences. Conference publishing process is overseen by the International Program Committee (IPC), consisting of academics from the national and international Universities and technical experts who oversees the correctness of review and publication processes. editor at 

Editorial decisions 

Editorial decisions on articles submitted to conference proceedings are based on independent peer review reports of least two external academic editors. The peer reviewers’ assessments are used to inform the editor’s decision as to whether or not to recommend publication to the IPC. The IPC subsequently makes the final decision on whether or not the paper will be published in conference proceedings. The editor may be guided by the policies of the proceedings editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. Editor is free to solicit additional reviews and guidance post contract to inform on the development of the manuscript.

Editorial process follows: 

Fair play 

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. 


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. 

Disclosure and conflicts of interest 

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in editor´s own research without the express written consent ot the author.


Authorship are based on the follow principles: 1. Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; and 2. Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and 3. Final approval of the version to be published; and 4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The corresponding author has the authority to act on behalf of all co-authors, and we expect the corresponding author to confirm this at the beginning of the publication process 

Duties of Reviewers

Reviewers are external experts chosen by editors to provide written opinions, with the aim of improving the conference papers. Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. 

Our reviewers adhere to the following policies: 


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. 


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. 

Standards of Objectivity 

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Acknowledgement of Sources Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor´s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. 

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest 

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards 

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable. 

Originality and Plagiarism 

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. 

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication 

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal or primary publication concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. 

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the proceedings editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. 





Lost password

High Tatras - Tatranske Matliare
June 5 - 7, 2018
to top